sex education

Sex education

Sex education is instruction on issues relating to human sexuality, including humansexual anatomysexual reproductionsexual activityreproductive health, emotional relations, reproductive rights and responsibilities, sexual abstinence, and birth control. Common avenues for sex education are parents or caregivers, formal school programs, and public health campaigns.


Human sexuality has biological, physical, emotional and spiritual aspects. The biological aspect of sexuality refers to the reproductive mechanism as well as the basic biological drive, libido, that exists in all species, which is strongly influenced by hormonal levels. The emotional or physical aspect of sexuality refers to the bond that arises between individuals, and is manifested physically or through emotions such as love, trust and caring. There is also a spiritual aspect of sexuality of an individual or as a connection with others. Experience has shown that adolescents are curious about aspects of their sexuality as well as the nature of sexuality in general, and that many will seek to experience their sexuality in some way.

Traditionally, adolescents in many cultures were not given any information on sexual matters, with discussion of these issues being considered taboo. Such instruction as was given was traditionally left to a child’s parents, and often this was put off until just before a child’s marriage. The progressive education movement of the late 19th century, however, led to the introduction of “social hygiene” in North American school curricula and the advent of school-based sex education. Despite early inroads of school-based sex education, most of the information on sexual matters in the mid-20th century was obtained informally from friends and the media, and much of this information was deficient or doubtful value, especially during the period following puberty when curiosity of sexual matters was the most acute. This deficiency became increasingly evident by the increasing incidence of teenage pregnancies, especially in Western countries after the 1960s. As part of each country’s efforts to reduce such pregnancies, programs of sex education were instituted, initially over strong opposition from parent and religious groups.

The outbreak of AIDS has given a new sense of urgency to sex education. In many African countries, where AIDS is at epidemic levels (see HIV/AIDS in Africa), sex education is seen by most scientists as a vital public health strategy.[2] Some international organizations such as Planned Parenthood consider that broad sex education programs have global benefits, such as controlling the risk of overpopulation and the advancement of women’s rights (see also reproductive rights). The use of mass media campaigns, however, has sometimes resulted in high levels of “awareness” coupled with essentially superficial knowledge of HIV transmission.[3]

According to SIECUS, the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States, 93% of adults they surveyed support sexuality education in high school and 84% support it in junior high school. In fact, 88% of parents of junior high school students and 80% of parents of high school students believe that sex education in school makes it easier for them to talk to their adolescents about sex.Also, 92% of adolescents report that they want both to talk to their parents about sex and to have comprehensive in-school sex education. Furthermore, a “…study, conducted by Mathematica Policy Research Inc. on behalf of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, found that abstinence-only-until-marriage programs are ineffective.”

There has also been some debate about whether LGBT issues should be included in school sex education programs. Proponents of LGBT sex education argue that encompassing homosexuality into the curricula would provide LGBT students with the sexual health information they need,and help to ameliorate problems such as low self-esteem and depression that researchhas shown can be present in LGBT individuals. They also claim that it could reduce homophobic bullying.Opponents often argue that teaching LGBT sex education would be disrespectful to some religions and expose students to inappropriate topics.They say that including homosexuality in the curriculum would violate parents’ rights to control what their children are exposed to and that schools should not inflict a particular political view on students.Currently, many sex education curricula do not include LGBT topics and research has reported that students often feel that they do not receive adequate instruction in LGBT sex topics.


Burt defined sex education as the study of the characteristics of beings: a male and female. Such characteristics make up the person’s sexuality. Sexuality is an important aspect of the life of a human being and almost all people, including children, want to know about it. Sex education includes all the educational measures which – regardless of the particular method used – may center on sex. He further said that sex education stands for protection, presentation extension, improvement and development of the family based on accepted ethical ideas.

Leepson sees sex education as instruction in various physiological, psychological and sociological aspects of sexual response and reproduction. Kearney (2008) also defined sex education as “involving a comprehensive course of action by the school, calculated to bring about the socially desirable attitudes, practices and personal conduct on the part of children and adults, that will best protect the individual as a human and the family as a social institution.” Thus, sex education may also be described as “sexuality education”, which means that it encompasses education about all aspects of sexuality, including information about family planningreproduction (fertilizationconception and development of the embryoand fetus, through to childbirth), plus information about all aspects of one’s sexuality including: body imagesexual orientationsexual pleasurevalues, decision making, communication, datingrelationshipssexually transmitted infections(STIs) and how to avoid them, and birth control methods. Various aspect of sex education are considered appropriate in school depending on the age of the students or what the children are able to comprehend at a particular point in time. Rubin and Kindendall expressed that sex education is not merely a unit in reproduction and teaching how babies are conceived and born. It has a far richer scope and goal of helping the youngster incorporate sex most meaningfully into his present and future life, to provide him with some basic understanding on virtually every aspect of sex by the time he reaches full maturity.

Public opinion studies

A survey conducted in Britain, Canada and the United States by Angus Reid Public Opinion in November 2011 asked adult respondents to look back to the time when they were teenagers, and describe how useful several sources were in enabling them to learn more about sex. By far, the largest proportion of respondents in the three countries (74% in Canada, 67% in Britain and 63% in the United States) said that conversations with friends were “very useful” or “moderately useful.” The next reputable source was the media (television, books, movies, magazines), mentioned by three-in-five British (65%) and Canadians (62%) and more than half of Americans (54%) as useful.

There are some striking differences on two other sources. While half of Canadians (54%) and Americans (52%) found their sex education courses at school to be useful, only 43% of British share the same view. And while more than half of Americans (57%) say conversations with family were useful, only 49% of Canadians and 35 percent of British had the same experience.


One approach to sex education is to view it as necessary to reduce the risk of certain sexual behaviors and equip individuals to make informed decisions about their personal sexual activity.

Another viewpoint on sex education, historically inspired by sexologists like Wilhelm Reich and psychologists like Sigmund Freud and James W. Prescott, holds that what is at stake in sex education is control over the body and liberation from social control. Proponents of this view tend to see the political question as whether society or the individual should teach sexualmores. Sexual education may thus be seen as providing individuals with the knowledge necessary to liberate themselves from socially organized sexual oppression and to make up their own minds. In addition, sexual oppression may be viewed as socially harmful. Sex and relationship experts like Reid Mihalko of Reid About Sex suggests that open dialogue about physical intimacy and health education can generate more self-esteem, self-confidence, humor, and general health.[94]

Another question in the sex education debate is whether the state or the family should teach sexual mores. Some believe that sexual mores should be left to the family, and sex-education represents state interference.

Some claim that certain sex education curricula break down pre-existing notions of modesty or encourage acceptance of what they consider immoral practices, such as homosexuality or premarital sex. A supporting web site is the Coalition for Positive Sexuality. Naturally, those that believe that homosexuality and premarital sex are a normal part of the range of human sexuality disagree with them.[citation needed]

Many religions teach that sexual behavior outside of marriage is immoral and/or psychologically damaging, and many adherents desire this morality to be taught as a part of sex education. They may believe that sexual knowledge is necessary, or simply unavoidable, hence their preference for curricula based on abstinence.[95]

LGBT sex education

Main article: LGBT sex education

One major source of controversy in the realm of sex education is whether LGBT sex education should be integrated into school curricula.[11] LGBT sex education includes safe sex practices for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transsexual individuals and general instruction in topics related to homosexuality. Studies[who?] have shown that many schools do not offer such education today.[12]


  1. Jump up^ Tupper, Kenneth (2013). “Sex, Drugs and the Honour Roll: The Perennial Challenges of Addressing Moral Purity Issues in Schools”. Critical Public Health.doi:10.1080/09581596.2013.862517.
  2. Jump up^ “Namibia National Policy on HIV/AIDS for the Education Sector”. USAID Health Policy Initiative. 2003.Archived from the original on 8 November 2013. Retrieved 8 November 2013.
  3. Jump up^ Piya Sorcar (1 December 2010). “A New Approach to Global HIV/AIDS Education”The Huffington Post. Retrieved 16 December 2010.
  4. Jump up^ SIECUS Report of Public Support of Sexuality Education (2009)SIECUS Report Online at the Wayback Machine
  5. Jump up^ Sex Education in America. (Washington, DC: National Public Radio, Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, and Kennedy School of Government, 2004), p. 5.
  6. Jump up^ Sari Locker, (2001) Sari Says: The real dirt on everything from sex to school. HarperCollins: New York.
  7. Jump up^ SIECUS Fact Sheet (includes research citations).
  8. Jump up^ Sanchez, Marisol. “Providing inclusive sex education in schools will address the health needs of LGBT Youth”. Center for the Study of Women UCLA. Retrieved October 17, 2013.
  9. Jump up to:a b Slater, Hannah. “LGBT-Inclusive Sex Education Means Healthier Youth and Safer Schools”Center for American Progress. Retrieved 11/02/13.
  10. Jump up^ Goodman, Josh. “5 Reasons Schools Should Adopt LGBTQ-inclusive Sex Ed”The Huffington Post. Retrieved 11/02/2013.
  11. Jump up to:a b c d Janofsky, Michael. “Gay Rights Battlefields Spread to Public Schools”The New York Times. Retrieved 11/02/13.
  12. Jump up to:a b c Formby, Eleanor (August 2011). “Sex and relationships education, sexual health, and lesbian, gay and bisexual sexual cultures: views from young people”.Sex Education 11 (3): 255–266.doi:10.1080/14681811.2011.590078.
  13. Jump up^ Villalva, Brittney. “Sex Education in Schools Should Include a Gay Agenda, Report Claims”The Christian Post. Retrieved 11/02/2013.
  14. Jump up^ Ellis, Viv; High (April 2004). “Something More to Tell You: Lesbian, Gay, or Bisexual Young Peoples”. Journal of Adolescence 30 (2): 213–225.
  15. Jump up to:a b c d Referred in paper by Jeanette De La Mare. October 2011.
  16. Jump up^ Rubin and Kindendall (2001)
  17. Jump up^ Slyer (2000)
  18. Jump up^ Gruenberg (2000)
  19. Jump up^ Reich (2006) Die Sexualität im Kulturkampf. Part one “the failure..” 6. The puberty problem – (3°) “A reflection..” – c. sexual relationships of pubescents – paragraph 4.a (pp. 198-99 of Italian edition)
  20. Jump up^ Deschamps, 1999
  21. Jump up^ “Joy of sex education” by George MonbiotThe Guardian, 11 May 2004
  22. Jump up to:a b DiCenso A. et al.Interventions to Reduce Unintended Pregnancies Among AdolescentsSystematic Review ofRandomized Controlled TrialsBritish Medical Journal2002;324:1426
  23. Jump up^ Ketting, E. & Visser, A., Contraception in the Netherlands: the low abortion rate explained. Patient Education and Counseling 23
  24. Jump up^ (in Dutch)
  25. Jump up^ Kirby, D. (2001). “Emerging Answers: Research Findings on Programs to Reduce Teen Pregnancy”. National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy. Homepage of the study.
  26. Jump up^ Kirby, D. (2007). “Emerging Answers 2007: Research Findings on Programs to Reduce Teen Pregnancy and Sexually Transmitted Diseases”. National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy.[dead link] Homepage of the study.[dead link]
  27. Jump up^ Mario Canseco (30 November 2011). “Americans, Britons and Canadians Disagree on Sex Education”Angus Reid Public Opinion. Retrieved 30 November 2011.
  28. Jump up^ Restoration of the Mexico City Policy
  29. Jump up^ Funding Restored to Groups That Perform Abortions, Other Care
  30. Jump up^ Uganda reverses the tide of HIV/AIDS[dead link]
  31. Jump up^ Health Gap: Pepfar Policies Retrieved February 26, 2014
  32. Jump up^ HIV & AIDS Education and Young People[dead link]
  33. Jump up^ National AIDS Control Organisation
  34. Jump up^
  35. Jump up^ Adolescents In Changing Times: Issues And Perspectives For Adolescent Reproductive Health In The ESCAP Region United Nations Social and Economic Commission for Asia and the Pacific
  36. Jump up to:a b Sex Has Many Accents TIME
  37. Jump up^ Sex education begins to break taboos China Development Brief, 2005-06-03
  38. Jump up^ Involve The Young! Interview with Dr Pramilla Senanayake, assistant director-general of the International Planned Parenthood Federation
  39. Jump up^ Kontula, Osmo (Nov 2010). The Evolution of Sex Education and Students’ Sexual Knowledge in Finland in the 2000s 10 (4). pp. 373–386. ISSN 1468-1811. Retrieved 28 January 2014.
  40. Jump up to:a b c Britain: Sex Education Under Fire UNESCO Courier;Jul/Aug2000, Vol. 53 Issue 7/8, pp. 17-18
  41. Jump up^
  42. Jump up^ Sexualaufklärung in Europa (German)
  43. Jump up^ Sexualkunde-Schmutzige Gedanken (German)
  45. Jump up^ Complaints against Germany about mandatory sex education classes declared inadmissible ECtHR press release 153 (2011), 22.09.2011
  46. Jump up^ Edukacja seksualna w polityce władz centralnych po transformacji ustrojowej
  47. Jump up^
  48. Jump up^ The Dutch model UNESCO Courier
  49. Jump up^ Gentiane Burgermeister, Education sexuelle en milieu scolaire, l’expérience genevoise; ” Int. J. Pub. Health, (1972) 17; 1; 53-57”.
  50. Jump up^ Education Act 1996
  51. Jump up^ “Teen pregnancy rates go back up”BBC News. 2009-02-26.
  52. Jump up^ “Teen Sex Survey”. Channel 4. 2008. Retrieved 2008-09-11.
  53. Jump up^ Cardinal praises “dedication and commitment” of Catholic teachers
  54. Jump up^
  55. Jump up^
  56. Jump up^ David J. Landry, Susheela Singh and Jacqueline E. Darroch (September–October 2000). “Sexuality Education in Fifth and Sixth Grades in U.S. Public Schools, 1999”.Family Planning Perspectives 32 (5).doi:10.2307/2648174PMID 11030258. Retrieved 2007-05-23.
  57. Jump up to:a b “Sex Education in the U.S.: Policy and Politics”(PDF). Issue Update. Kaiser Family Foundation. October 2002. Retrieved 2007-05-23.
  58. Jump up^ Darroch, JE; Jacqueline E. Darroch, David J. Landry and Susheela Singh (September–October 2000). “Changing Emphases in Sexuality Education In U.S. Public Secondary Schools, 1988-1999”Family Planning Perspectives 32 (6): 204–11, 265. PMID 11030257. See especially Table 3.
  59. Jump up^ Stanger-Hall, Kathrin F.; David W. Hall (October 14, 2011). “Abstinence-Only Education and Teen Pregnancy Rates: Why We Need Comprehensive Sex Education in the U.S”. In Vitzthum, Virginia. Plos One 6 (10).doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024658. Retrieved 28 January 2014.
  60. Jump up to:a b “Teen Birth Rate Rises for First Time in 14 Years”(Press release). CDC National Center for Health Statistics. 2007-12-05. Retrieved 2007-12-05. “The report shows that between 2005 and 2006, the birth rate for teenagers aged 15-19 rose 3 percent, from 40.5 live births per 1,000 females aged 15-19 in 2005 to 41.9 births per 1,000 in 2006. This follows a 14-year downward trend in which the teen birth rate fell by 34 percent from its all-time peak of 61.8 births per 1,000 in 1991.”
  61. Jump up^ “National Youth Risk Behavior Survey: 1991-2005”(PDF). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Control and Prevention. Archived from the original on 2007-09-26. Retrieved 2007-05-25.
  62. Jump up to:a b Hauser, Debra (2004). “Five Years of Abstinence-Only-Until-Marriage Education: Assessing the Impact”. Advocates for Youth. Archived from the original on 2007-04-28. Retrieved 2007-05-23.
  63. Jump up^ Dailard, Cynthia (February 2001). “Sex Education: Politicians, Parents, Teachers and Teens”The Guttmacher Report on Public Policy. Guttmacher Institute. Retrieved 2007-05-23.
  64. Jump up^ “On Our Side: Public Support for Comprehensive Sexuality Education” (Fact Sheet). SIECUS. Archived from the original on 2007-02-07. Retrieved 2007-05-23.
  65. Jump up^ “NAEA Executive Summary of Key Findings”National Abstinence Education Association. 2007-05-03. Retrieved 2007-05-24.
  66. Jump up^ Comprehensive Sex Education is More Effective at Stopping the Spread of HIV Infection
  67. Jump up^ AMA Policy Finder – American Medical Association
  68. Jump up^ NASP Position Statement on Sexuality Education
  69. Jump up^ Sexuality Education for Children and Adolescents – Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health and Committee on Adolescence 108 (2): 498 – Pediatrics
  70. Jump up^ APHA: Policy Statement Database
  71. Jump up to:a b Adolescent Health
  72. Jump up^ “Abstinence-Only Programs: Harmful to Women & Girls: Federal Funding for Abstinence-Only Programs”Legal Momentum. Archived from the original on 2007-09-29. Retrieved 2007-05-25.
  73. Jump up^ States that decline abstinence-only funding include California, Colorado, Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, New Jersey, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Rhode Island, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin.
  74. Jump up^ “Maine Declines Federal Funds for Abstinence-Only Sex Education Programs, Says New Guidelines Prohibit ‘Safe-Sex’ Curriculum”. Medical News Today. 2005-09-23. Retrieved 2007-05-24.
  75. Jump up^ Huffstutter, P.J. (2007-04-09). “States refraining from abstinence-only sex education”Boston Globe (Los Angeles Times). Retrieved 2007-05-23.
  76. Jump up^ “An Overview of Federal Abstinence-Only Funding”(PDF). Legal Momentum. February 2007. Retrieved 2007-05-25.[dead link][dead link][1][dead link]
  77. Jump up^ Mixon, Melissa (2007-10-06). “Abstinence programs brace for major funding cut”. Austin American-Statesman. Archived from the original on 2007-10-13. Retrieved 2007-10-17.
  78. Jump up^ “Study: Abstinence programs no guarantee” Associated Press. 2007-04-14. Archived fromthe original on 2007-10-12. Retrieved 2007-04-18.
  79. Jump up^ “Mathematica Findings Too Narrow” (Press release). National Abstinence Education Association. 2007-04-13. Retrieved 2007-05-25.
  80. Jump up^ Mulrine, Anna (27 May 2002). “Risky Business”. U.S. News & World Report. pp. 42–49.
  82. Jump up^
  83. Jump up^ Texas House of Representatives : Representative Villarreal, Mike
  84. Jump up^ The Texas State Senate – Rodney Ellis Press Releases
  85. Jump up^
  86. Jump up^
  87. Jump up^ Sex Education And Catholic Schools
  88. Jump up^ Keenan, J. F. (2010). CONTEMPORARY CONTRIBUTIONS TO SEXUAL ETHICS. Theological Studies, 71(1), 148-167. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
  89. Jump up^ Humanae Vitae – Encyclical Letter of His Holiness Paul VI on the regulation of birth, 25 July 1968
  90. Jump up^ Health and Human Relations Education
  91. Jump up to:a b Ministry of Education (2002). Sexuality Education: Revised Guide for Principals, Boards of Trustees, and Teachers. Wellington: Learning Media.ISBN 0478267274. Retrieved 26 June 2013.
  92. Jump up^ “Section 60B: Consultation about treatment of health curriculum — Education Act 1989 — New Zealand Legislation”. Parliamentary Counsel Office. Retrieved 26 June 2013.
  93. Jump up^ “Section 25AA: Release from tuition in specified parts of health curriculum — Education Act 1989 — New Zealand Legislation”. Parliamentary Counsel Office. Retrieved 26 June 2013.
  94. Jump up^ Mihalko, Reid. “About Reid”Reid About Sex. Retrieved 3 June 2011.
  95. Jump up^ PBS, February 4, 2005 Religion & Ethics Newsweekly,


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s